<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Free Radical Therapy Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freeradicaltherapy.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freeradicaltherapy.com/blog</link>
	<description>A new approach to health.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Toxic Oil Spill Illness: Not just “for the birds” by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.freeradicaltherapy.com/blog/?p=20#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeradicaltherapy.com/blog/?p=20#comment-120</guid>
		<description>One additional comment on dispersants now being employed:  The EPA, in mid May, gave approval of inserting dispersants at the site of the oil leak 5,000 feet below the gulf surface.  Approval was given to two surfactants, Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527, plus a solvent.  The name of solvent listed in the May 24 edition of Chem &#038; Engineering News was omitted, although the non-volatile carbon tetrachloride is often mentioned.  Apparently, my inclusion of Sea Brat 4 in the original blog report is no longer being discussed by authorities (for or against).  In either case this new information does not change the general technique suggested for ridding the body of these toxins.  Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One additional comment on dispersants now being employed:  The EPA, in mid May, gave approval of inserting dispersants at the site of the oil leak 5,000 feet below the gulf surface.  Approval was given to two surfactants, Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527, plus a solvent.  The name of solvent listed in the May 24 edition of Chem &#038; Engineering News was omitted, although the non-volatile carbon tetrachloride is often mentioned.  Apparently, my inclusion of Sea Brat 4 in the original blog report is no longer being discussed by authorities (for or against).  In either case this new information does not change the general technique suggested for ridding the body of these toxins.  Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
